• 首页关于本刊投稿须知订阅指南广告合作投稿指南旧版入口联系我们
期刊订阅

植物保护淘宝

植物保护微店
尹艳琼1, 齐国君2, 李向永1, 赵雪晴1, 谌爱东1*.白背飞虱及其捕食性天敌在云南香型软米水稻品种上的发生特征[J].植物保护,2021,47(1):192-198.
白背飞虱及其捕食性天敌在云南香型软米水稻品种上的发生特征
Population dynamic of white-backed planthopper and its predatory natural enemies on fragrant and soft rice varieties in Yunnan province
投稿时间:2019-11-12  修订日期:2020-01-18
DOI:DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2019616
中文关键词:  香型软米  白背飞虱  黑肩绿盲蝽  蜘蛛  种群动态
英文关键词:fragrant and soft rice  Sogatella furcifera  Cyrtorhinus lividipennis  spider  population dynamic
基金项目:国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项(2016YFE0117400); 国家自然科学基金地区科学基金(31860504, 31760536); 广州市珠江科技新星专项(201806010013)
作者单位E-mail
尹艳琼1, 齐国君2, 李向永1, 赵雪晴1, 谌爱东1* 1.云南省农业科学院农业环境资源研究所, 昆明 650205
2.广东省农业科学院植物保护研究所, 广东省植物保护新技术重点实验室, 广州510640 
E-mail:shenad68@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 371
全文下载次数: 370
中文摘要:
      为研究云南稻区香型软米水稻品种对白背飞虱Sogatella furcifera(Horváth)及其主要捕食性天敌黑肩绿盲蝽Cyrtorhinus lividipennis和蜘蛛发生动态的影响, 以地方香型软米水稻品种‘云恢290’‘文稻11号’‘红香软7号’为供试品种, ‘Taichung Native 1’(TN1)为感虫对照, 系统调查了白背飞虱?黑肩绿盲蝽和蜘蛛种群田间发生量?结果表明:大田期3个香型软米水稻品种上田间虫量均略超过‘TN1’, 表现为感虫; 水稻分蘖期白背飞虱的峰期虫量2 500~3 863头/百丛, 其中低龄若虫占80%以上?捕食性天敌田间种群数量与对照差异不显著, 黑肩绿盲蝽发生高峰期比白背飞虱滞后1周, 而蜘蛛田间种群数量随生育期逐渐上升, 在水稻成熟期达最大值?在白背飞虱发生高峰期, 益害比接近1∶40?分蘖期低龄若虫对后期的发生量有重要影响, 是防治关键期; 水稻拔节期至蜡熟期可充分利用黑肩绿盲蝽?蜘蛛等天敌对白背飞虱的控制作用?
英文摘要:
      In order to clarify the effects of fragrant and soft rice varieties on the population dynamic of Sogatella furcifera and its dominant predatory natural enemy, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis and spiders, we investigated the population amount of white-backed planthopper (WBPH) and C.lividipennis and spiders in the field, taking ‘Yunhui 290’ ‘Wendao 11’ and ‘Hongxiangruan 7’ as the test varieties and ‘Taichung native 1’ (TN1) as the control. The population amount of WBPH on three fragrant and soft rice varieties was larger than that on the ‘TN1’, indicating that these fragrant and soft rice varieties were sensitive to WBPH. In the tillering stage, the peak amount was 2 500-3 863 per 100 hills and more than 80% was young nymphs. There was no significant difference of predatory natural enemies between the tested varieties and control. Peak time of C.lividipennis was one week later than that of white-backed planthopper, while the spider population gradually increased with the time and reached the maximum at rice maturity period. Natural enemies and ratio of pest was close to 40∶1 at the peak time of WBPH. Young nymphs in tillering stage played the key role of population amount of WBPH in rice at late stage, and should be the key time for WBPH management. From jointing stage to waxing stage, white-backed planthopper population can be controlled effectively by making full use of natural enemies such as C.lividipennis and spiders.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭