• 首页关于本刊投稿须知订阅指南广告合作投稿指南旧版入口联系我们
期刊订阅

植物保护淘宝

植物保护微店
向礼波 1, 石 磊 2, 徐 东 3, 宋远胜 4, 薛敏峰 1, 龚双军 1*, 杨立军 1*, 喻大昭 1.3种新型生物产品及复配杀菌剂防治 小麦赤霉病的研究[J].植物保护,2021,47(4):276-281.
3种新型生物产品及复配杀菌剂防治 小麦赤霉病的研究
Control effect of three new biological products and mixture fungicides on Fusarium head blight
投稿时间:2020-04-08  修订日期:2020-05-22
DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2020185
中文关键词:  小麦赤霉病  减药增效  生物农药  寡糖·链蛋白  大黄素甲醚
英文关键词:Fusarium head blight  reducing fungicide and increasing efficacy  biofungicide  oligosaccharins·plant activator protein  physcion
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0200500); 国家现代农业(小麦)产业技术体系(CARS-3-1-2); 湖北省农业科技创新中心项目(2016-620-000-001-015); 湖北省农科院领军人才计划(L2018013)
作者单位E-mail
向礼波 1, 石 磊 2, 徐 东 3, 宋远胜 4, 薛敏峰 1, 龚双军 1*, 杨立军 1*, 喻大昭 1 1. 湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所, 农业农村部华中作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 农作物重大病虫草害防控 湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430064
2. 湖北省襄阳市植物保护站, 襄阳 441100
3.湖北省襄阳市襄州区植物保护站, 襄阳 441100
4. 湖北省荆州市纪南农业服务中心, 荆州 434034 
龚双军gsj204@126.com, 杨立军yanglijun1993@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 618
全文下载次数: 583
中文摘要:
      为筛选防治小麦赤霉病的新型生物产品及其减药增效配方, 于2016年分别在湖北襄阳和荆州开展田间试验?评价了植物免疫蛋白质生物农药6%寡糖·链蛋白可湿性粉剂?诱抗剂0.5%大黄素甲醚水剂和生物刺激素爱诺森可溶液剂对赤霉病的防治效果, 筛选了上述3种生物产品与常规化学农药430 g/L戊唑醇悬浮剂?25%咪鲜胺乳油和50%多菌灵可湿性粉剂减药增效组合配方?结果表明:6%寡糖·链蛋白可湿性粉剂和0.5%大黄素甲醚水剂处理的防效分别在20.18%~24.37%和18.32%~22.98%之间, 爱诺森处理对小麦赤霉病无防治效果?430 g/L戊唑醇悬浮剂?25%咪鲜胺乳油和50%多菌灵可湿性粉剂等3种杀菌剂减量20%分别与寡糖·链蛋白?大黄素甲醚和爱诺森复配田间防效表明, 50%多菌灵可湿性粉剂减量20%与寡糖·链蛋白?大黄素甲醚和爱诺森3种生物产品复配处理的病情指数在3.34~7.81, 防治效果在63.99%~77.56%, 其增效范围在3.22%~47.59%, 与430 g/L戊唑醇悬浮剂未减药用量的防效相当( P >0.05)?50%多菌灵可湿性粉剂减量20%与寡糖·链蛋白?大黄素甲醚和爱诺森3种生物产品复配处理的产量显著高于未减药的多菌灵处理产量( P <0.05), 增产幅度在3.74%~9.28%之间?30 g/L戊唑醇悬浮剂和25%咪鲜胺乳油减量20%与寡糖·链蛋白?大黄素甲醚和爱诺森3种生物产品复配处理的防效和增产效果趋势不显著?
英文摘要:
      In order to screen new biological products and related formulations against Fusarium head blight (FHB) for reducing fungicides while increasing efficacy, the effects of plant immune protein oligosaccharins·plant activator protein 6% WP, inducer physcion 0.5% AS and biostimulator Enersol SL were evaluated for controlling FHB in Xiangyang and Jingzhou of Hubei province in 2016. The synergistic formulas of oligosaccharins·plant activator protein, physcion and Enersol with 430 g/L tebuconazole SC, 20% prochloraz EC and 50% carbendazim WP was screened as well. The results showed that the control efficacies of oligosaccharins·plant activator protein and physcion were between 20.18%-24.37% and 18.32%-22.98%, respectively, while Enersol had no control effect on FHB. The control effects of the 430 g/L tebuconazole SC, 25% prochloraz EC and 50% carbendazim WP reduced 20% dosage with oligosaccharide·catenin, physcion and Enersol was conducted. The disease index of carbendazim with 20% reduction mixed with oligosaccharins·plant activator protein, physcion and Enersol was between 3.34 and 7.81, and efficacy was between 63.99% and 77.56%, and the synergy ranged from 3.22% to 47.59%. Furthermore, the control efficacy of oligosaccharins·plant activator protein and physcion was similar to that of tebuconazole without reducing dosage 20% off ( P >0.05). The yield of the treatment of carbendazim with 20% reduction mixed with oligosaccharins·plant activator protein, physcion and Enersol increased by 3.74%-9.28%, significantly higher than the treatment without reduction ( P <0.05). 30 g/L tebuconazole SC and prochloraz 25% EC with 20% reduction mixed with oligosaccharins·plant activator protein, physcion and Enersol showed no significant differences in control efficacy and wheat production.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭