钱广晶1, 张书平1, 宋学雨1,2, 毕守东1*,张国庆3, 邹运鼎2, 方国飞4, 闫 萍1.基于Bayes判别法的马尾松毛虫一代、二代幼虫发生期的预报[J].植物保护,2020,46(2):122-128. |
基于Bayes判别法的马尾松毛虫一代、二代幼虫发生期的预报 |
Forecast for the occurrence period of Dendrolimus punctatus larvae based on Bayes discriminant method for the first and second generations |
投稿时间:2019-02-23 修订日期:2019-04-27 |
DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2019074 |
中文关键词: 马尾松毛虫幼虫 发生期 Bayes判别法 预报 |
英文关键词:Dendrolimus punctatus larvae period of occurrence the Bayes discriminant analysis forecast |
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项(201404410) |
作者 | 单位 | E-mail | 钱广晶1, 张书平1, 宋学雨1,2, 毕守东1*,张国庆3, 邹运鼎2, 方国飞4, 闫 萍1 | 1. 安徽农业大学理学院, 合肥 230036 2. 安徽农业大学林学与园林学院, 合肥 230036 3. 安徽省潜山县林业局, 潜山 246300 4. 国家林业局森林病虫害防治总站, 沈阳 110034 | bishoudong@163.com |
|
摘要点击次数: 606 |
全文下载次数: 778 |
中文摘要: |
为了提高马尾松毛虫Dendrolimus punctatus (Walker)发生量预测预报结果的准确性,本文运用Bayes判别分析法建立安徽省潜山县1983年-2016年33年的马尾松毛虫一代和二代幼虫发生期的预报模型。一代幼虫发生期的判别函数方程为:f(1)=-15 744.058-361.501x1+60.759x2+133.502x3+511.368x4;f(2)=-16 854.938-375596x1+70.405x2+132.608x3+529.690x4;f(3)=-17 645.295-384.956x1+73.601x2+134.955x3+541782x4;f(4)=-18 179.639-382.408x1+71.342x2+135.234x3+549.655x4对1983年-2018年一代幼虫发生期预报结果历史符合率为97.06%,二代幼虫发生期的判别函数方程为:f(1)=-134 898.483+559.235x5+113112x6-250.033x7+1 461.350x8;f(2)=-138 908.622+573.572x5+118.340x6-252.691x7+1 474.569x8;f(3)=-141 430.680+577.358x5+125.727x6-254.610x7+1 483.336x8;f(4)=-143 185.175+578.968x5+129628x6-256.102x7+1 491.257x8对二代幼虫发生期的预报结果的历史符合率为100%。对2017年和2018年的验证回报,与实况结果一致。筛选出对预报量有密切关系的预报因子是本方法预报准确性的关键,该方法是一种简便准确性高的预报方法。 |
英文摘要: |
To improve the accuracy of forecasting the occurrence of Dendrolimus punctatus Walker, the Bayes discriminant analysis method was used to predict the occurrence period of the first and second generations of D. larvae over a period of 33 years from 1983 to 2016 in Qianshan county, Anhui province. The discriminant function equation of the occurrence period of the first-generation larvae was as followed: f(1)=-15 744.058 -361501x1+60.759x2+133502x3+511.368x4;f(2)=-16 854.938-375.596x1+70.405x2+132.608x3+529690x4;f(3)=-17 645295-384.956x1+73601x2+134.955x3+541.782x4;f(4)=-18 179.639-382408x1+71.342x2+135.234x3+549.655x4.The historical coincidence rate of the forecast results from 1983 to 2018 was 97.06%. The discriminant function equation for the second-generation larvae was as followed: f(1)=-134 898.483+559235x5+113.112x6-250.033x7+1 461.350x8;f(2)=-138 908.622+573.572x5+118340x6-252.691x7+1 474.569x8;f(3)=-141 430.680+577.358x5+125.727x6-254.610x7+1 483.336x8;f(4)=-143 185.175+578.968x5+129.628x6-256.102x7+1 491.257x8. The historical coincidence rate of the forecast results for the second-generation larvae from 1983 to 2018 was 100%. The verification returns for 2017 and 2018 were consistent with the observed data. Screening out the forecasting factors closely related to the forecasting quantity was the key to the accuracy of forecast. This forecasting method is simple and accurate. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|