| 李春杰1;许艳丽1;王义2;刘长仲3;钱秀娟3.不同培养方法对昆虫病原线虫质量影响及其评价[J].植物保护,2007,33(5):88-92. |
| 不同培养方法对昆虫病原线虫质量影响及其评价 |
| Evaluation of the effects of different methods on the quality of entomopathogenic nematodes |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 昆虫病原线虫 大量繁殖 活体 离体 评价 |
| 英文关键词:entomopathogenic nematodes mass production in vivo in vitro evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
| 李春杰1;许艳丽1;王义2;刘长仲3;钱秀娟3 |
| 1.中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所 哈尔滨 150081;2.美国Rutgers大学 New Jersey 08901;3.甘肃农业大学 兰州730070 |
| 摘要点击次数: 702 |
| 全文下载次数: 451 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 采用传统的White trap法、Lowtek培养法、液体和固体培养4种方法繁殖异小杆线虫[Heterorhabditis bac-teriophora(Hb-1)]和斯氏线虫[Steinernemacarpocapsae(Sc-2)],测定和计算了线虫的产量、质量和成本。试验结果显示,4种方法培养对线虫侵染力和存活率有一定影响,但差异不显著(p<0.05),2种线虫从高到低的顺序为:White trap法>Lowtek法>固体培养>液体培养;产量最高的是固体培养法,其次是液体培养法,Lowtek法最低;繁殖成本从低到高的顺序为:Lowtek法<固体培养 |
| 英文摘要: |
| White Trap,Lowtek,liquid and solid culture methods were used to raise Heterorhabditis bacteriophora-1 and Steinernema carpocapsae-2.The quality and yield of nematodes were surveyed,and the efficiency and cost were calculated.The results showed that the infective ability and survival rate of nematodes raised by different methods weren't significantly different from each other,the sequence of which was as followed:White trap>Lowtek>solid culture>liquid culture.The sequence of yield and efficiency was as followed:solid culture>liquid culture>White trap>Lowtek. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
